• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • About
  • Contact
  • Founding Documents
  • Shop 76 Supply
  • LIVE

The Stafford Voice

Our little place to talk about and share about life.

  • Life
  • Leadership
  • History
  • Miscellaneous
    • Politics
      • National
      • World
      • Election
    • Military
      • Soldier Spotlight
    • Foreign Policy

Health Care

Democrats Manipulate CBO

April 13, 2010 by Daniel

By: David Limbaugh | Copyright 2010 CREATORS.com

It’s sobering that 58 percent of American voters support the repeal of Obamacare just three weeks after Congress passed it, and that’s probably without even realizing the extent of the tainted cost estimates from the Congressional Budget Office or the tax consequences of the bill. If accurate accounting and the actual tax consequences were to be fully publicized, this nightmare would be even less popular.

The White House would disagree, of course, but don’t be fooled. The newspaper The Hill reports that White House budget director Peter Orszag says the CBO numbers actually underestimate the savings from the bill.

Orszag cites two reasons. One is that “on major pieces of legislation,” the CBO historically has been “too conservative rather than too optimistic” in its projections. The other is that the CBO’s scoring “largely does not take into account this evolution toward paying for quality,” which, Orszag thinks, “in this decade will begin to pay off.”

Well, the first reason — that the CBO historically has been “too conservative” — says nothing about the scoring of this particular bill. We know that government estimates involving health care programs have been grossly underestimated in the past, such as the government’s cost projections in 1965 that Medicare Part A would rise to $9 billion by 1990; its actual costs were $67 billion. The government’s 1987 projections for the Medicaid special hospitals subsidy were underestimated by a staggering factor of more than 100; they projected annual costs to be $100 million, and they ended up being $11 billion by 1992. American voters instinctively understand this phenomenon. In a Wall Street Journal op-ed last month, Scott Rasmussen and Doug Schoen argued that the main reason Obama hasn’t been able to move the skeptical public toward supporting Obamacare is that “people simply don’t trust the official projections. … Eighty-one percent of voters say it’s likely the plan will end up costing more than projected.”

Orszag’s second reason appears to be that Obama’s bureaucrats will start denying payments for treatments and procedures they deem unwarranted. That is, they’ll start dictating care decisions — something they’ve vehemently denied — and they’ll ration and pay only for that which they approve. So even if there are some savings here — which is highly doubtful — they will be achieved at the cost of patient and physician choice and the quality of care.

Read the entire article HERE.

Filed Under: National Tagged With: Conservative, Health Care

Responding to Obamacare

March 24, 2010 by Daniel

Barack Obama and Joe Biden before signing Obamacare

Now that Obamacare has been signed by President Obama, attack plans take shape to diminish its level of socialism. One of those ideas comes by way of Dick Morris, contributor for HumanEvents.com

Responding to Obamacare: Restore, Defeat, Defund, Repeal

Let’s begin our reaction to the passage of Obamacare by remembering Winston Churchill’s famous formulation with which he introduced his war memoirs:

In defeat: defiance.

In war: resolution.

In victory: magnanimity.

In peace: goodwill.

Now is the time for defiance! Here’s what we must do:

1) Restore the Medicare cuts mandated in this bill. Block the reduction of physicians’ fees by 21 percent scheduled to take effect this fall. Override the cuts in Medicare that require annual approval by Congress. Challenge the Democrats over each and every cut. Try to peel away enough votes to stop the cuts from driving doctors and hospitals to adopt the course already taken by the Mayo Clinic in refusing to take Medicare patients.

2. Defeat the Democrats in the 2010 election! Start with the traitors who voted no in November and then switched to a shameful yes when it counted in March. Then go on to win the open seats in the House and Senate. And then fight to replace as many Democrats as possible. Remember: Any Democrat who voted no would have voted yes if they had needed his or her vote. The only way to repeal Obamacare is to vote Republican.

3. Defund. Once we get the majority in both chambers, defund appropriations for the Obamacare program. The bill passed by the Congress and signed by the president is simply an authorization measure. Funds must be appropriated for it each year by Congress. Through zero funding these changes, we can cripple them before they take full effect.

4. Repeal. And, once we defeat Barack Obama, we need to proceed to repeal this disastrous plan before it can ruin our health care system. Then, we must replace it with a Republican alternative that relies on the marketplace, tax incentives and individual responsibility to provide health care to all Americans.

Above all, we must finally learn the fundamental lesson this political process we have been through has to teach: that there is no such thing as a conservative or moderate Democrat.

Filed Under: Politics Tagged With: administration, Conservative, Health Care, Obama

The Civil War Against Americanism

March 23, 2010 by Daniel

Tea Party Protesters | AP Photo

There is no question that many feel as though there has been an inherent attack on American and its exceptionalism. With the stampede on American Liberty by way of the recent passing of Obamacare, there is much merit to the charge.

Dennis Prager, writer and contributor for Townhall, echoes the same sentiment.

It’s a Civil War: What We Do Now

 terrible thing happened to America on Sunday, March 21, 2010.The country took its biggest step ever down a road diametrically opposed to its original intent of keeping the state small so that the individual can be free and great.

Therefore, in this unprecedented crisis of values, this is what needs to be done:

  1. Know and teach America’s core values.
  2. Recognize that we are fighting the left, not liberals.
  3. Democrats should be referred to as Social Democrats.
  4. Work tirelessly to repeal the bill.
  5. Our motto: “The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.”
  6. Do not let other matters distract.
  7. Acknowledge that we are in a non-violent civil war.

Thank God this civil war is non-violent. But the fact is that the left and the rest of the country share almost no values. The American value system and the leftist value system are irreconcilable. If the left wins, America’s values lose. If American values prevail, the left loses.

After Sunday’s vote, for the first time in American history, one could no longer confidently believe that the American system will prevail. And if we don’t fight for it, we don’t deserve it.     Read the entire article HERE.

Filed Under: National Tagged With: Conservative, Health Care

Houses Passes Health Care Reform Bill 219-212

March 21, 2010 by Daniel

Obama and Pelosi on Health Care Reform | HuffingtonPost

That’s right, it passed. 219 ayes vs. 212 nays in a stunning vote against the people and their liberty.

How did they each person vote?

  FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 165

(Democrats in roman; Republicans in italic; Independents underlined)
      H R 3590      RECORDED VOTE      21-Mar-2010      10:49 PM
      QUESTION:  On Motion to Concur in Senate Amendments
      BILL TITLE: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

  Ayes Noes PRES NV
Democratic 219 34    
Republican   178    
Independent        
TOTALS 219 212    


—- AYES    219 —

Ackerman
Andrews
Baca
Baird
Baldwin
Bean
Becerra
Berkley
Berman
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Blumenauer
Boccieri
Boswell
Boyd
Brady (PA)
Braley (IA)
Brown, Corrine
Butterfield
Capps
Capuano
Cardoza
Carnahan
Carney
Carson (IN)
Castor (FL)
Chu
Clarke
Clay
Cleaver
Clyburn
Cohen
Connolly (VA)
Conyers
Cooper
Costa
Costello
Courtney
Crowley
Cuellar
Cummings
Dahlkemper
Davis (CA)
Davis (IL)
DeFazio
DeGette
Delahunt
DeLauro
Dicks
Dingell
Doggett
Donnelly (IN)
Doyle
Driehaus
Edwards (MD)
Ellison
Ellsworth
Engel
Eshoo
Etheridge
Farr
Fattah
Filner
Foster
Frank (MA)
Fudge
Garamendi
Giffords
Gonzalez
Gordon (TN)
Grayson
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Grijalva
Gutierrez
Hall (NY)
Halvorson
Hare
Harman
Hastings (FL)
Heinrich
Higgins
Hill
Himes
Hinchey
Hinojosa
Hirono
Hodes
Holt
Honda
Hoyer
Inslee
Israel
Jackson (IL)
Jackson Lee (TX)
Johnson (GA)
Johnson, E. B.
Kagen
Kanjorski
Kaptur
Kennedy
Kildee
Kilpatrick (MI)
Kilroy
Kind
Kirkpatrick (AZ)
Klein (FL)
Kosmas
Kucinich
Langevin
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lee (CA)
Levin
Lewis (GA)
Loebsack
Lofgren, Zoe
Lowey
Luján
Maffei
Maloney
Markey (CO)
Markey (MA)
Matsui
McCarthy (NY)
McCollum
McDermott
McGovern
McNerney
Meek (FL)
Meeks (NY)
Michaud
Miller (NC)
Miller, George
Mitchell
Mollohan
Moore (KS)
Moore (WI)
Moran (VA)
Murphy (CT)
Murphy (NY)
Murphy, Patrick
Nadler (NY)
Napolitano
Neal (MA)
Oberstar
Obey
Olver
Ortiz
Owens
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor (AZ)
Payne
Pelosi
Perlmutter
Perriello
Peters
Pingree (ME)
Polis (CO)
Pomeroy
Price (NC)
Quigley
Rahall
Rangel
Reyes
Richardson
Rodriguez
Rothman (NJ)
Roybal-Allard
Ruppersberger
Rush
Ryan (OH)
Salazar
Sánchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sarbanes
Schakowsky
Schauer
Schiff
Schrader
Schwartz
Scott (GA)
Scott (VA)
Serrano
Sestak
Shea-Porter
Sherman
Sires
Slaughter
Smith (WA)
Snyder
Speier
Spratt
Stark
Stupak
Sutton
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Tierney
Titus
Tonko
Towns
Tsongas
Van Hollen
Velázquez
Visclosky
Walz
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watson
Watt
Waxman
Weiner
Welch
Wilson (OH)
Woolsey
Wu
Yarmuth

—- NOES    212 —

Aderholt
Adler (NJ)
Akin
Alexander
Altmire
Arcuri
Austria
Bachmann
Bachus
Barrett (SC)
Barrow
Bartlett
Barton (TX)
Berry
Biggert
Bilbray
Bilirakis
Bishop (UT)
Blackburn
Blunt
Boehner
Bonner
Bono Mack
Boozman
Boren
Boucher
Boustany
Brady (TX)
Bright
Broun (GA)
Brown (SC)
Brown-Waite, Ginny
Buchanan
Burgess
Burton (IN)
Buyer
Calvert
Camp
Campbell
Cantor
Cao
Capito
Carter
Cassidy
Castle
Chaffetz
Chandler
Childers
Coble
Coffman (CO)
Cole
Conaway
Crenshaw
Culberson
Davis (AL)
Davis (KY)
Davis (TN)
Deal (GA)
Dent
Diaz-Balart, L.
Diaz-Balart, M.
Dreier
Duncan
Edwards (TX)
Ehlers
Emerson
Fallin
Flake
Fleming
Forbes
Fortenberry
Foxx
Franks (AZ)
Frelinghuysen
Gallegly
Garrett (NJ)
Gerlach
Gingrey (GA)
Gohmert
Goodlatte
Granger
Graves
Griffith
Guthrie
Hall (TX)
Harper
Hastings (WA)
Heller
Hensarling
Herger
Herseth Sandlin
Hoekstra
Holden
Hunter
Inglis
Issa
Jenkins
Johnson (IL)
Johnson, Sam
Jones
Jordan (OH)
King (IA)
King (NY)
Kingston
Kirk
Kissell
Kline (MN)
Kratovil
Lamborn
Lance
Latham
LaTourette
Latta
Lee (NY)
Lewis (CA)
Linder
Lipinski
LoBiondo
Lucas
Luetkemeyer
Lummis
Lungren, Daniel E.
Lynch
Mack
Manzullo
Marchant
Marshall
Matheson
McCarthy (CA)
McCaul
McClintock
McCotter
McHenry
McIntyre
McKeon
McMahon
McMorris Rodgers
Melancon
Mica
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Miller, Gary
Minnick
Moran (KS)
Murphy, Tim
Myrick
Neugebauer
Nunes
Nye
Olson
Paul
Paulsen
Pence
Peterson
Petri
Pitts
Platts
Poe (TX)
Posey
Price (GA)
Putnam
Radanovich
Rehberg
Reichert
Roe (TN)
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Rooney
Ros-Lehtinen
Roskam
Ross
Royce
Ryan (WI)
Scalise
Schmidt
Schock
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Shadegg
Shimkus
Shuler
Shuster
Simpson
Skelton
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Smith (TX)
Souder
Space
Stearns
Sullivan
Tanner
Taylor
Teague
Terry
Thompson (PA)
Thornberry
Tiahrt
Tiberi
Turner
Upton
Walden
Wamp
Westmoreland
Whitfield
Wilson (SC)
Wittman
Wolf
Young (AK)
Young (FL)

 

Filed Under: National Tagged With: administration, Health Care, House of Representatives, Pelosi

The Race for Health Care – Stupak Caves

March 21, 2010 by Daniel

Bart Stupak

It appears now that health care reform will pass soon, and before we know it America will fundamentally change because of it. Argue what you may, but this reform pressed on by Obama and his administration is an attack at the very liberty of America and its people.

One person, Bart Stupak, appeared to uphold his values of pro-life but everyone knew that he was just holding out for himself. Everyone knew that he would ultimately vote for it, simply because he could amend it later. So what did they do to appease him? Issue a White House Executive Order.

STATEMENT FROM COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR DAN PFEIFFER

Today, the President announced that he will be issuing an executive order after the passage of the health insurance reform law that will reaffirm its consistency with longstanding restrictions on the use of federal funds for abortion.

While the legislation as written maintains current law, the executive order provides additional safeguards to ensure that the status quo is upheld and enforced, and that the health care legislation’s restrictions against the public funding of abortions cannot be circumvented.     Read the text of the Executive Order HERE

For more commentary:

  • Hot Air
  • Michelle Malkin
  • Memeorandum
  • Gateway Pundit
  • The Hill


Watch CBS News Videos Online

Filed Under: National Tagged With: administration, Health Care, Obama

Top Health Care Reform Issue

March 18, 2010 by Daniel

Tea Party Protesters

Say what you may, being there are a lot of issues regarding the proposed health care reform bill, but there is one issue that stands out to the majority. No, it’s not cost even though that is a top issue. However, the top issue is the increasing amount of opposition to it. You can’t deny that if the people don’t want it, then it shouldn’t be something to push.

Take a look at the most recent poll put out by The Pew Research Center:

Pew Research Center Health Care Opposition
Pew Research Center

Taking a look at these graphs, and one would wonder – aside from the democrats – how the elected government could force this piece of legislature down the throat of the people. There isn’t but one demographic that supports it. Strangely enough, it would be interesting to hear why they support it. Other than that, no one wants this.

So why continue to push it? During the campaign, Barack Obama ran on the idea of ‘Change.’ Largely, most people understood that there would certainly be changes made, but they also didn’t know just how radical his ideology was and is.

FoxNews | Fox News Poll: 55% Oppose Health Care Reform

As Americans wait for Congress to act on health care, a Fox News poll released Thursday finds 55 percent oppose the reforms being considered, while 35 percent favor them.

In addition, just over half of voters think House Democrats are “changing the rules” to get their bill passed.

About a third of voters (31 percent) think House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats are “playing by the rules” to get health care through, while 53 percent think they are “changing the rules.” Looking at the results by political party, 53 percent of Democrats think their party is playing by the rules, about one in four think they are changing the rules (27 percent) and the rest are unsure (19 percent). Varying majorities of Republicans (78 percent) and independents (57 percent) think House Democrats are changing the rules to pass the bill.

The level of public support for the health care overhaul has remained fairly steady since last July — 35 percent favor it now and 36 percent favored it last summer. The number opposed — 55 percent — is up from 51 percent in January, and from 47 percent last July. Opposition hit a high of 57 percent in December.

Among partisans, the president’s party faithful are alone in supporting the proposed reforms. Sixty-six percent of Democrats favor them, while 53 percent of independents and 88 percent of Republicans oppose them.

Read the rest HERE

For more commentary:

  • Michelle Malkin
  • The Moderate Voice
  • Memeorandum
  • Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion
  • Hot Air

Filed Under: National Tagged With: Health Care

Common Sense Takes on Talking Points

March 16, 2010 by Daniel

Common Sense Tombstone

For most people, they are concerned with balancing their checkbooks and living on a budget. Politicians, don’t have to worry about it. They seem to be living in a fantasy world where balanced budgets don’t exist. Take a look at the current health care reform proposals. They plan on paying for some of it by taking from Medicare. The only problem. Where then will Medicare get its funds?

Moving numbers around to soothe the concerns of the people is a joke. It just doesn’t work. Take for instance your own budget. Wanting a new car? Just take the money from your mortgage budget and allocate it over to fund that new car. It’s just that easy, right? WRONG! But, that’s what the government is trying to do in order to pass their health care reform bill.

Townhall: Talking Points vs. Reality by Thomas Sowell

In a swindle that would make Bernie Madoff look like an amateur, Barack Obama has gotten a substantial segment of the population to believe that he can add millions of people to the government-insured rolls without increasing the already record-breaking federal deficit.

Those who think in terms of talking points, instead of realities, can point to the fact that the Congressional Budget Office has concurred with budget numbers that the Obama administration has presented.

Anyone who is so old-fashioned as to stop and think, instead of being swept along by rhetoric, can understand that a budget– any budget– is not a record of hard facts but a projection of future financial plans. A budget tells us what will happen if everything works out according to plan.

The Congressional Budget Office can only deal with the numbers that Congress supplies. Those numbers may well be consistent with each other, even if they are wholly inconsistent with anything that is likely to happen in the real world.

The Obama health care plan can be financed without increasing the federal deficit– if the administration takes hundreds of billions of dollars from Medicare. But Medicare itself does not have enough money to pay its own way over time.

However money is juggled in the short run, the government’s financial liabilities are increased by adding this huge new entitlement of government-provided insurance. The fact that these new financial liabilities can be kept out of the official federal deficit projection, by claiming that they will be paid for with money taken from Medicare, changes nothing in the real world.

Read the rest HERE

Filed Under: National Tagged With: Health Care, Obama

The ‘Is Health Care a Right?’ Debate

March 10, 2010 by Daniel

Obama giving speech on health care reform

As health care reform continues to be ram-rodded down the throats of the people, debate over whether it is a right or not carries on. One excellent viewpoint is offered by Walter E. Williams.

Is Health Care a Right?

Most politicians, and probably most Americans, see health care as a right. Thus, whether a person has the means to pay for medical services or not, he is nonetheless entitled to them. Let’s ask ourselves a few questions about this vision.

Say a person, let’s call him Harry, suffers from diabetes and he has no means to pay a laboratory for blood work, a doctor for treatment and a pharmacy for medication. Does Harry have a right to XYZ lab’s and Dr. Jones’ services and a prescription from a pharmacist? And, if those services are not provided without charge, should Harry be able to call for criminal sanctions against those persons for violating his rights to health care?

You say, “Williams, that would come very close to slavery if one person had the right to force someone to serve him without pay.” You’re right. Suppose instead of Harry being able to force a lab, doctor and pharmacy to provide services without pay, Congress uses its taxing power to take a couple of hundred dollars out of the paycheck of some American to give to Harry so that he could pay the lab, doctor and pharmacist. Would there be any difference in principle, namely forcibly using one person to serve the purposes of another? There would be one important strategic difference, that of concealment. Most Americans, I would hope, would be offended by the notion of directly and visibly forcing one person to serve the purposes of another. Congress’ use of the tax system to invisibly accomplish the same end is more palatable to the average American.

True rights, such as those in our Constitution, or those considered to be natural or human rights, exist simultaneously among people. That means exercise of a right by one person does not diminish those held by another. In other words, my rights to speech or travel impose no obligations on another except those of non-interference.     . . . MORE

Filed Under: National Tagged With: Health Care, rights

Obama’s Health Care Thugocracy

March 9, 2010 by Daniel

Rahm Emanuel | Stephen Crowley/The New York Times

The current momentum for Obama’s health care reform appears to have taken a detour towards thugocracy. With the recent outing of Eric Massa, the proof is in the alleged pudding.

“I am sitting there showering, naked as a jaybird, and here comes Rahm Emanuel, not even with a towel . . . his finger in my chest, yelling at me because I wasn’t going to vote for the president’s budget,” Massa said. “You know how awkward it is to have a political argument with a naked man?”

Despite shower-room politics, the people are not seeing eye to eye with Democratic leaders. There is a growing opposition to their efforts to ram through a bloated, trillion-dollar health care bill that will hike taxes, raise premiums, and cut Medicare. One leader that is aiding with the current thugocracy of Obama’s health care reform is Nancy Pelosi. She went on record saying, “But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy.”

Even the Politico has noticed:

‘The Chicago way” is romanticized because of Sean Connery’s soliloquy in “The Untouchables”:

“He brings a knife to the fight, you bring a gun; he puts one of yours in the hospital, you put one of his in the morgue.”

But that was the Capone era. The city moved on to the Democratic machine. It doesn’t need knives or guns to control the town. Just power and money — which buy people, which begets more power and more money — and more control.

To the true connoisseur of Chicago-style politics, nothing is more irksome than the persistent media drone that Barack Obama and his band of homies — aka the “Chicago mafia” — are skilled practitioners of it. All because they come from the town whose organization perfected the acquisition and exercise of total political power by any means necessary, defining it for much of the past century.

Filed Under: National Tagged With: Health Care, Obama

Republican Scott Brown Wins Senate Seat

January 19, 2010 by Daniel

Mass. Republican Senator Scott Brown

Republican Scott Brown has won the Mass. senate seat, and now that the controvercial election for the late Ted Kennedy seat is decided, there are certain issues that are now coming forward.

One of the main concerns is when Scott Brown will be sworn in to his newly elected position. And with health care reform at its most pivotal moment, the democratic party is seen scrambling for the next step to radically change the U.S. health care system.

Fox News – Brown Beats Coakley in Massachusetts Senate Race

He also breaks the Democrats’ 60-vote, filibuster-proof majority in Washington, posing big problems for Obama’s agenda. Most immediately, Brown’s win sends Democrats into a scramble to pass health care reform before he arrives in Washington. Democrats were already weighing options for how to fast-track the bill before polls closed Tuesday.

The other thing that will be the talk of the town is how this monumental election could be a blueprint for future elections withing the GOP.

Wall Street Journal – Steele: Massachusetts Race ‘A Model for Campaigns of the Future’

In a memo to RNC members today, Steele said the national committee has been “working very diligently behind the scenes” with the Massachusetts Republican Party for the past three months to make the race what it is today—a likely Republican takeover in one of the bluest states in the nation.

“Never in the history of our party have so many fellow Republicans from all over the country worked so hard to help another state,” he wrote. “This is a model for campaigns of the future.”

For more commentary:

  • Michelle Malkin
  • The Snooper Report
  • The Western Experience

Filed Under: National, Politics Tagged With: election, Health Care, Senate

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Go to page 4
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Sign up to receive our FREE newsletter!

* = required field

powered by MailChimp!

© 2023 · The Stafford Voice