<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Daily Dose</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thestaffordvoice.com/2010/02/03/daily-dose-23/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thestaffordvoice.com/2010/02/03/daily-dose-23/</link>
	<description>Conservative in a world of Liberals.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:31:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://thestaffordvoice.com/2010/02/03/daily-dose-23/comment-page-1/#comment-1011</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 11:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestaffordvoice.com/?p=490#comment-1011</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the added information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the added information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BHO</title>
		<link>http://thestaffordvoice.com/2010/02/03/daily-dose-23/comment-page-1/#comment-1010</link>
		<dc:creator>BHO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 05:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestaffordvoice.com/?p=490#comment-1010</guid>
		<description>They were not the only window company listed actually.
About $100M was allocated for potential tax credits for glass and window manufacturers of which 7 were listed. All of them are listed on the Serious Materials blog and in the fed award document that is published.

Serious qualified for 0.5% of that, if they spend $1.5M on equipment and create jobs in the next 4 years. The other window and glass companies qualified for 99.5% of it.

Doesn’t sound like much cronyism here.
Sounds like for all the good Serious has done, they got the short end of the stick.

Moreover, in the IRS review it shows an independent group was hired, not affiliated with DOE or IRS to choose the 183 companies included. DOE had no involvement.

The company posted a blog with the facts that Stossel refused to air, like Zoi did not even work for the DOE when the VP toured one of their plants (and he has toured 57 plants in the US in the past year):
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.seriousmaterials.com/?p=1007&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blog.seriousmaterials.com/?p=1007&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They were not the only window company listed actually.<br />
About $100M was allocated for potential tax credits for glass and window manufacturers of which 7 were listed. All of them are listed on the Serious Materials blog and in the fed award document that is published.</p>
<p>Serious qualified for 0.5% of that, if they spend $1.5M on equipment and create jobs in the next 4 years. The other window and glass companies qualified for 99.5% of it.</p>
<p>Doesn’t sound like much cronyism here.<br />
Sounds like for all the good Serious has done, they got the short end of the stick.</p>
<p>Moreover, in the IRS review it shows an independent group was hired, not affiliated with DOE or IRS to choose the 183 companies included. DOE had no involvement.</p>
<p>The company posted a blog with the facts that Stossel refused to air, like Zoi did not even work for the DOE when the VP toured one of their plants (and he has toured 57 plants in the US in the past year):<br />
<a href="http://blog.seriousmaterials.com/?p=1007" rel="nofollow">http://blog.seriousmaterials.com/?p=1007</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
